For the attention of the Royal Courts Of Justice High Court. Statement of Nigel Baggaley also known as Nigel Quinlan in reply to application to the president of the family division regards McKenzie Friend assistance of Nigel Baggaley and two General Civil Restraint Orders.

I Nigel Baggaley vehemently deny all allegations made by smith partnership solicitors.
I vehemently deny all allegations made by Mr O’Grady barrister for steven parker.
I dispute the accounts of actions stated in both statement by Smith Partnership and Mr O’Grady
I allege Mr O’Grady has committed perjury by lying openly to the court on 18th December 2013
I accuse Smith Partnership and Mr O’Grady of conspiring to have myself and business suffer significant reputational damage.
I also accuse Mr O’Grady and Smith Partnership from misleading and lying to HHJ Bellamy regards the actual accounts of matters in an attempt to cause damage to the case of Ms C.
I say the Barrister and the Solicitors for the father had a ploy to put a stop to the appeal that should have been heard on that day. Instead of any type of normal hearing taking place HHJ Bellamy allowed the barrister and in fact encouraged the barrister turn the hearing into a half day hearing taken up completely with matter regards Nigel Baggaley. Mr O’Grady states in his own statement that the hearing was not about the child, he forgets the fact the hearing was about a case management decision being appealed, not the child. However it shows the barristers intentions on the day of an appeal hearing were always to turn the hearing into something it was not. Mr O’Grady’s behaviour and manipulation of the judge was absolutely disgusting.
HHJ Bellamy did not behave in a fair or reasonable fashion at all. I entered the court an hour after Ms C entered, as the judge would not allow me to enter the court with Ms C (against the guidance for MFs). I had been detained by 7 police officers called in by Mr O’Grady whom had falsely informed 999 that he had been attacked. The police turned up in force believing it to be a real emergency, it was clear the police were of the opinion Mr O’Grady had wasted their time as they released me and my wife from their detention.
It is transparent that Mr O’Grady had set up this situation, he had made an application to the court to have me removed before the day of the hearing. He then turned up and according to the court office applied to the court office to have police attend the courtroom as security for his client whom apparently felt at risk of me, even though i have never met him or spoke to him, i certainly do not know him. Then on the day of the hearing Mr O’Grady calls 999 for an alleged incident that took place directly in front of at least 4 C.I.D officers awaiting witness duty stood no more than 25 feet away, and also at least 5 solicitor and social workers sitting directly next to where myself and Ms C sat at the time of the alleged incident.
clearly there was a strawman effect taking place on the day of the hearing, again i say to prevent the appeal taking place, which was the result, and secondly to discredit and damage myself and my business.
The allegations raised by the smith partnership are denied in full and I put them to strict proof.
The allegations made by Mr O’Grady of what he says took place in front of cctv in the court building on 18th December 2013 are vehemently denied and I state are libelous and slanderous, I am currently taking civil action against Mr O’Grady for slander and libel and harassment against myself and my company Diy Law Shop Limited.
The actual circumstances of what took place against what Mr O’Grady states took place are below.

Ms C was approached by Mr O’Grady and handed disclosure in the only 1 minute i did not stand with or sit with Ms C.
It is relevant that court understand Mr O’Grady represents a rapist whom Ms C is the victim. Therefore the court may consider the fact Ms C was terrified of the hearing and even more terrified of her attacker being near to her.
Mr O’Grady then approached Ms C a second time, this was unwanted attention by the barrister and Ms C made it clear to him she did not have anything to say to him.
Mr O’Grady asked Ms C 3 times to “come with me so we may talk”.
on each occasion I asked Mr O’Grady to accept the fact Ms C would not be going with him. Understandably Ms C was becoming very upset and nervous at Mr O’Grady’s behaviour.
Each time i spoke to Mr O’Grady he would simply ignore me and write down onto a pad what I said.
The first time i spoke to Mr O’Grady he raised his hand to me with his palm facing directly at my head and stated “I'm not talking to you, you do not talk to me” (he stated that in the most rude and condescending manner possible).
After Mr O’Grady had asked Ms Cooper 3 times to go with him and her replying no i stated to Mr O’Grady “ she is not coming with you now go away”, Mr O’Grady ignored me and continued another 3 occasions to haranguing Ms C to go with him.
I could see my client was absolutely upset and it was clear Mr O’Grady was attempting to bully Ms C into doing what he wanted her to do. I stood up and walked up to Mr O’Grady and without touching him stated that he would have to go away or i would protect Ms C by removing him from her in a citizens arrest for harassment.
Mr O’Grady at that point i think got exactly what he wanted, a reaction, directly on CCTV that he could then use to call the police and then ask the judge to see the video. I am aware the CCTV does not have sound hence Mr O’Grady was able to mislead HHJ Bellamy into believing he was some sort of victim of aggressive behaviour and that he believed i was going to head butt him.
i entered the court an hour later after the barrister called 999 and 7 officers detained myself and my wife for “attacking a court member of staff”.
I was disappointed to walk into an unfounded allegation by HHJ Bellamy of “your behaviour in the court building today etc” I attempted to speak and reply to the allegations but HHJ Bellamy cut me short and then did not allow me to speak, removing my right to reply to the allegations, and therefore breaching my human rights to a fair trial and certainly not following guidance on MFs.
HHJ Bellamy then informs me i have a civil restraint order from Coventry County Court.

I have read Mr O’Grady’s statement and it is pure fantasy to say the least, in fact i will go as far to say Mr O’Grady has fabricated and lied this story. Mr O’Grady knows there is now sound to the recording that he and HHJ Bellamy have had the advantage of seeing while the court have refused to provide me a copy of said CCTV footage.
Mr O’Grady’s allegations, if they are to be believed all rely on the fact there is no sound. Had there been sound the court would be able to hear Mr O’Grady haranguing Ms C and being asked by myself on 3 separate occasions to go away and leave her alone, before I stand up to Mr O’Grady.
Mr O’Grady has simply made a statement that should the court watch the footage, does not fit in to a time scale on the footage.
If the court accepts what Mr O’Grady says how can the court account for the time of alleged incident taking so much longer than what seems to be a much shorter conversation in Mr O’Grady’s statement.
If the court is willing to play the cctv footage whilst I speak along quoting my and Mr O’Grady’s conversation the court will see my version of events word for word fit the footage. Where as I believe should Mr O’Grady do the same it will not fit.
I knew nothing of the GCRO before HHJ Bellamy rose the issue on 18th December 2013. I have never been notified or served of any such order. The order is not listed on the justice site.
It took the courts almost 2 weeks to clarify the situation, the court in Nuneaton (not Coventry) made the order in 2012 after i made duplicate claims at 2 courts. The court apparently sent out service and notice but have also confirmed Royal Mail returned the order 3 days after posting.
Therefore I do not accept I have been served or notified of said order.
I do not agree with HHJ Bellamy that i may have breached the order based on the fact I have worked in many cases in the past 2 years month in month out in the magistrates, county court, high court, PRFD and court of protection as well as the appeal court RCJ, and the queens bench, tribunals etc. Not at any time has any Judge raised the GCRO.
I must add to that, many solicitors especially in family cases re children have attempted to have me removed, yet the judges (many higher than HHJ Bellamy) have refused the applications.
I do not believe the order existed until very recently, it is very strange how HHJ Bellamy came across this order when no other judge or barrister in those other cases had, i question the validity of the order.
HHJ Bellamy has also made a second GCRO in my name and my business. I am shocked at the lengths His Honour Is willing to go in this matter and i question HHJ Bellamys motives. I do not believe His Honour has acted fairly or reasonably.
The judges actions on the day in question were strange and anger filled Ms C could not take the pressure, specifically because the court had placed the rapist to sit directly behind his victim in the courtroom, his barrister being at the other end of the court. Yet HHJ Bellamy offered for Mr Parker to sit with the police upon my arrival in the court room. Again, I see no reason why Mr Parker would feel he is at threat from myself. again this was simply a ploy to build a false picture to the Judge, Unfortunately Ms C was let down as was I by HHJ Bellamy’s gullibility. Miss C decided to leave the court while HHJ Bellamy was out printing off a copy of the ‘Coventry GCRO’. I left the court with her. The situation now is one in which Ms C has been placed in an impossible position by the court and the barrister regards her appeal. An injustice caused by Mr O’Grady and The Smith Partnership whom at the end of the got what they set out to achieve.
Mr O’Grady’s story has some very big holes in it i ask the court to consider. First Mr O’Grady’s account of the police officers telling him Nigel Baggaley is known, is rejected by the police whom maintain theyre officers would not have stated such a thing, second Mr O’Grady states the police officers told him the police were on their way to the court - why would the police be on their way to the court at that point - the police officers themselves had only just become aware of any allegations.
the police took no action, the court must consider the police had access to the the CCTV. The court stated Mr O’Grady did not want me to be arrested - he just wanted me to be removed from the court - which I and my wife were. Why then did Mr O’Grady go to the trouble of telling the police he had been “attacked”. That is exactly what the police informed me and my wife on the day, that the call was ‘male member of court staff stating he is being attacked by member of public’. If Mr O’Grady wanted me removed from the court why did he not approach the court office and seek security do so - that is the usual protocol.
He did not do so in my opinion because of the fact the court staff were in the area and had been approached by myself, my client Ms C and my wife, we had already approached the office before Mr O’Grady had done so and we had sought to see the judge about Mr O’Grady behaviour toward Ms C.
Mr O’Grady witnessed us doing so and I believe it was after we had complained about Mr O’Grady and sought to see the judge that Mr O’Grady hatched a scheme to bring the police to the court in their droves expecting to find court staff being attacked - only to find me, my client and my wife quietly drinking tea in the court restaurant. Oblivious to any problem at all and awaiting the hearing.
Once the police had viewed the CCTV they were not interested in me at all, even though they had detained me and my wife while my client attended court alone without her assistance.
Mr O’Grady had applied to have me removed from the hearing in his skeleton argument, applied to the court for police to attend the hearing due to my being a risk to his client, complained to the police of being attacked prior to the hearing, and then convinced HHJ Bellamy (without any evidence at all) that the court needed to take swift action to have me removed as MKF, The effect of all of that in my opinion was to have me removed from assisting ms C in her case. They knew without me assisting her her case would fall apart which is exactly what took place.
If the Royal Courts of Justice wishes to see no better case of an abuse of power and an abuse of the court system then the RCJ need look no further, the actions of Mr O’Grady on the day of the hearing were absolutely disgusting. He harassed Ms C and then followed that up with a malicious and false allegation to the police - all of which amounted to Mr O’Grady his and his clients own way. The appeal could simply not go ahead after the hearing becoming an absolute debacle, even Mr O’Grady in his statement becomes clearly agitated at the fact the whole day was taken up with the subject of Nigel Baggaley. HHJ Bellamy in my opinion made a complete mockery of the justice system on the day and very badly let down the child in the case and Ms C.
Remember with respect this hearing was an important appeal hearing, it was a case where Ms C had been found by a circuit judge to have been raped by her ex partner. Previously Ms C solicitors had wrongfully informed her that she “had to” agree to a contact order for the father/rapist.
Once Ms C was informed she did not in fact have to agree at all, she withdrew her consent. The court reacted by having cafcass assess, unfortunately they did not assess on the basis of the information available and in particular did not have the judgement from the previous circuit judge of the rape and other degrading and controlling behaviours by the father.
Ms C appealed the order the court made giving contact to the father/rapist.
The fathers solicitors in my opinion had serious problems in an appeal convincing an appeal court the father placed no risk of harm to the child, either emotionally or sexually. I believe a strawman effect was put in place by the solicitors for the father and the barrister to attempt to derail the appeal process.
It was successful and now I find myself answering to this court.
I applied to vary the order made by HHJ Bellamy and he refused to even consider it, instead he simply informed me of this hearing in the RCJ on the 17th January 2014 to which i have sought a video link hearing.
I do admit i do not understand the actions of HHJ Bellamy, as stated previously i have continuously assisted other clients and made many applications in coventry, Nuneaton, Leicester and other courts over the past 2 years, yet not one judge has ever come up with this information before re the GCRO, it was not on the Justice register, therefore the question remains where did HHJ Bellamy get this information from? and why was it not acted on prior to HHJ Bellamy producing it?
There is also the question of the original order being null and void by the fact other high court judges have allowed me to continue against the order.
HHJ Bellamy then seems to have made a second restraint order for another 2 years. I see his actions as reckless and unfair. It is absolutely unreasonable to attempt to ban me from my work on the basis of allegations that remain unproven. The court is asked to consider, is it realistic to believe a barrister would call out the police to the court in an emergency 999 call only to 5 minutes later say he doesn't want me arrested? is that what the police are there for ? to be called out as private security? to remove people from the court the barristers do not want to attend their hearings?
To be absolutely clear I am denying the allegations, I am saying that Mr O’Grady has lied and fabricated his story and i am also saying HHJ Bellamy has fallen for the fabrications and lies and that he provided at no point any opportunity for to defend myself, this is the first opportunity i have had.
I am very angry and upset by the actions of Mr O’Grady.

Please find below evidence of emails between myself and the court regards the first restraining order that i was unaware of, please note the highlighted email from the court where the court is clear that the notice was not sent by any type of ‘sign for’ post. It was sent in normal mail and was returned to the court 3 days after sending unopened. I did not have any idea of this order at all.

Nuneaton County, Enquiries (Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

24/12/2013

To: 'diylawshop hinckley'

Dear Sir,

The Court will not act until we receive the application and the fee or valid fee remission. As you run your own business then you should have an income. If you apply for fee remission we will have to do a determination based on the requirements of the EX160 to see if you qualify for a full or part remission.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

Actions

Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

23/12/2013

To: diylawshop hinckley

Thank you for your email to Nuneaton County Court

Please note that if you are filing a document by email to any of Nuneaton County Courts external customer facing E-mail accounts, it is your responsibility to ensure it complies with the Court User E-Mail Guidance.

Please refer to:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/email-guidance

diylawshop hinckley

23/12/2013

To: Nuneaton County, Enquiries

im fee exempt, and under the circumstances a notice to the judge whom made the order should suffice. however i will send the form, in the meantime i would like the following message to go to the judge named on the order.

Sir

I am seeking an urgent hearing tomorrow, 24th/december/2013 to set aside the previous order placing a restraining order against me. I have not been served or notified of the order, nor was i given an opportunity to defend any application to impose the order or decision to impose the order.

I my business relies on my attending courts and assisting my clients. This order has only recently been made known to me

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of diy law shop. Warning: Although diy law shop has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.

Nuneaton County, Enquiries (Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

23/12/2013

To: 'diylawshop hinckley'

Dear Sir,

As previously advised you will need to make a formal application to the Court on a form N244 and pay the fee of £80.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

diylawshop hinckley

23/12/2013

To: Nuneaton County, Enquiries

I will need to see the judge urgently then, therefore I request from the judge whom made the order an urgent hearing Date, as this matter is obstructing my business and personal life from continuing with normal effect.

I was not living at that address at that date. the order also was not published on justice.

The order was obviously sent back due to the fact i did not live at the address.

Also why did the court say nothing in all the times i have appeared assisting others IN YOUR COURTS? again i ask that you provide proof of posting.

Nigel Baggaley

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

Nuneaton County, Enquiries (Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

23/12/2013

To: 'diylawshop hinckley'

Dear Sir,

The order was sent to 69 Strathmore Road, Hinckley, LE10 0LW. There is no proof of postage as we do not send orders out recorded/signed for delivery.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

23/12/2013

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

To: 'diylawshop hinckley'

Dear Sir,

The order was sent out on 10 April 2012. It was returned by Royal Mail, however it is still deemed served under the Civil Procedure Rules if it was the correct address for service.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Actions

diylawshop hinckley

20/12/2013

To: Nuneaton County, Enquiries

please forward evidence of the serving of the order.

thanks

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

ActiNuneaton County, Enquiries (Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

20/12/2013

To: 'diylawshop hinckley'

Dear Sir,

I can confirm that the order was served upon you at the time of it being made at your last known address of 69 Strathmore Road, Hinckley, Leicestershire, LE10 0LW and we have had no application to discharge the order since.

If you wish to apply to discharge the order you should complete a form N244 and pay the fee of £80 (or apply for a valid fee remission) and we will then refer the matter to District Judge Lynch in accordance with paragraph 4 of the order of His Honour Judge Gregory dated 19 March 2012. The application will then be considered on the basis of the papers in the first instance.

The Court is now closed and will reopen on Monday 23 December 2013 - no hearings will be arranged in the meantime.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

Actions

diylawshop hinckley

20/12/2013

To: Nuneaton County, Enquiries

i hereby seek an urgent hearing to remove the order. I have not been notified of this order until the 18th december 2013. i was not served with the order or notified of the order. this order has had a major effect on my work. i urgently need a hearing in the next day

nigel baggaley

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

Nuneaton County, Enquiries (Enquiries@nuneaton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk)

Add to contacts

20/12/2013

To: 'diylaw@outlook.com'

Outlook Active View

1 attachment (32.7 KB)

1NU00227.pdf

View online

Download as zip

Dear Sir,

Please find attached a copy of your Civil Restraint Order which quite clearly shows that there is one in force against you.

Yours faithfully,

Kristofer Wilson

Administrative Officer

Nuneaton County Court

To: Hearings@Coventry.CountyCourt.gsi.gov.uk

URGENT MATTER FOR THE ATTENTION OF HHJ GREGORY

I AM NOT LISTED OFFICIALLY AS HAVING ANY RESTRAINING ORDER: THEREFORE PLEASE REPLY ASAP TO CONFIRM THAT NO ORDER WAS MADE ON 19 MARCH 2013 BY HHJ GREGORY AT COVENTRY COUNTY COURT OF A GENERAL CIVIL RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST MYSELF.

PLEASE EMAIL A LETTER CONFIRMING THE COURT CAN NOT FIND ANY ORDER AS STATED ABOVE.

PLEASE SEE BELOW THE SCREENSHOT FROM 'JUSTICE' SHOWING I AM NOT LISTED AS HAVING ANY RESTRAINING ORDER

NIGEL BAGGALEY - 52 RUGBY ROAD, HINCKLEY, LEICESTERSHIRE, LE100QD. 01455 233058

Civil restraint orders

Share this

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on printMore Sharing Services

A Civil Restraint Order (CRO) is an order issued against people who have had more than one court claim or application dismissed or struck out for being totally without merit. Details of these orders are published as a matter of public record. The order prevents that person from issuing further claims or making applications in some or all of the county courts in England and Wales and also in the High Court, without first getting the permission of the judge named in the order.

If the Judge Orders a General Civil Restraint Order (GCRO), the order is applicable to all the county courts and the high court.

If the Judge orders an Extended Civil Restraint Order (ECRO), the order is limited to a specified group of courts.

General Civil Restraint Orders in force

Surname	Forenames	Court where order issued	Date when order complete
Akinwande	Nessie	Dartford	24 February 2014
Alpha Industrial Ltd		High Court Of Justice Chancery Division Birmingham District Registry	23/01/2015
Beckett	Colin	Oxford	02/12/2014
Betts	John William	Luton County Court	18/09/2015
Branch	Dr Joel	Spencer Civil Appeals	21/05/2014
Brodie	Selwyn Emmanuel	Cardiff Civil Justice Centre	09/08/2014
Casqueiro	David Baldwin	Worcester County Court	04/04/2014
Cercel	Constantin Alexandru	Worcester County Court	25/11/2015
Childs	Leslie Alphonso Gayle, aka Quinton Leslie Gayle Childs, Quinton Leslie Alphonso Gayle Childs, Leslie Gayle Childs, Quinton Leslie Childs, Gayle Quinton Childs, Gayle Childs, Leslie Childs & Kenroy Brown	Chancery Divison, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	13/01/2015
CKE Engineering Ltd		High Court of Justice Chancery Division Birmingham District Registry	23/01/2015
Dale	Richard Freeman	Royal Courts of Justice	03/07/2015
Douglas	Leroy	Nottingham County Court	14/11/2015
Elliot	Peter	Queens Bench Division, Manchester District Registry	10/04/2015
Ellis	Edward William	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	13/05/2014
Emery	Ana Maria	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	19/06/2014
Eneremadu	Cyriacus	Administrative Court Office	15/11/2014
Fabb	David Lawrence	High Court Of Justice Chancery Division Birmingham District Registry	23/01/2015
Gallucci	Amorino	Cambridge County Court	17/09/2015
Gbaja-Biamila	Bolaji	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	14/05/2014
Graham Gray	Andrew James Benjamin	Dartford County Court Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	13/09/2014 14/07/2015
Hardy	Richard Henry	Gloucester & Cheltenham County Court	22/10/2015
Haron	Francesca	Swansea	20/06/2014
Hastings Carew-Reid	John	Chancery Division, Royal Courts of Justice	24/07/2014
Henry-Darius	Veronica	Royal Courts of Justice	01/03/2015
Hoarth	John Martin Edward	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	13/05/2014
Ismail	Afham	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	04/06/2015
Ismail	Afham	Royal Courts of Justice	04/06/2015
Ismail	Bibi Nazrah	Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	04/06/2015
Ismail	Bibi Nazrah	Royal Courts of Justice	04/06/2015
Johnson	Lee	Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	29/11/2014
Kelway	Peter	Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	10/09/2015
Khalil	Dr Magda	Bristol District Registry - Queens Bench Division	07/07/2015
Lambert	Lee	Liverpool District Registry, Liverpool Civil and Family Courts	10/04/2014
Linder	Eugene	Brighton County Council	16/11/2014
Lima	Luis	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	15/01/2015
Ludlum	John Michael	ACO	09/03/2014
McDonald	Christine	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	11/02/2015
More	Jacques	Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	26/02/2015
Nseowo	Sylvester	Telford County Court	26/11/2015
Okoturo	Emiko	Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	18/02/2015
Petri	Ms Georgina	Birmingham County Court	12/08/2015
Popa	Mihaela-Iuliana	Northampton (CCBC) County Court	01/02/2015
Robinson	Frederick	Liverpool District Registry	23/01/2014
Senior-Milne Sheikh Sheikh	Graham Nassau Gordon Anal Rabia	Court of Appeal (Civil) Royal Courts of Justice Royal Courts of Justice Royal Courts of Justice	18/11/2014 15/07/2015 12/07/2015
Simms	Patrick	York County Court	19/06/2014
Todd	Wilfred	QB Division, Winchester District Registry	27/02/2014
Vaidya	Dr Shreedhar	Royal Courts of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division)	13/11/2014
Warner	Glenford A	Queens Bench High Court	16/09/2015
Wells	Ivor	Oldham County Court	25/02/2015
Wynter	Collette	Luton County Court	19/06/2015
Zinda	Justin Oliver	Royal Courts of Justice	17/02/2014

Extended Civil Restraint Orders in force

Surname	Forenames	Court where order issued	Date when order complete
Anas	Saria	High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division	01/04/2014
Abrahams	Peter	Royal Courts of Justice	09/10/2015
Banfield	Lawrence St. John and Beaulah	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	31/01/2014
Bennetts	Jonathan Lionel William	Exeter County Court	03/05/2014
Bey	Richard	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	23/07/2015
Booth	Frederick Lonen	Blackpool County Court	01/03/2014
Brown	Robert Leslie	High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Royal Courts of Justice	01/03/2014
Buller Le Cruit	Cessaro Antonio	Manchester District Registry	27/07/2014
Burke	David Mellory	Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	05/07/2014
Cameron	Paul	Royal Courts of Justice	27/08/2015
Cameron	Paul	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	27/08/2015
Carroll	John T	Chancery Division, Birmingham District Registry	13/08/2014
Chapman	Colin Brian	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	18/07/2015
Choudhury	Khalique Rashid	Chancery Division, Manchester District Registry	21/02/2015
Chukwuma	Innocent Ibe	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	06/08/2015
Cleminson	David	Carlisle County Court	20/12/2015
Communities United Party		Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	21/05/2014
Decoulos	Elaine	Administrative Court Leeds	16/07/2014
Diamond	Sue	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	19/06/2015
Dobson	Michael	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative court	20/06/2014
Easman	Laurence	Liverpool County Court	01/08/2015
Easman	William	Liverpool County Court	01/08/2015
Ennison	Maureen	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	28/11/2014
Foster	Floyd George	Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	03/09/2015
Gayle	Trevor Leslie	Court of Appeal (Civil) Royal Courts of Justice	09/07/2015
Gibb	Sheila	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	15/07/2015
Griffin	Simon John	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	15/07/2015
Hagger	William Kenneth	Leicester County Court	11/11/2015
Hammond	Michael Nyantache	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	25/10/2015
Harpur	Kathleen	Liverpool County Court	17/09/2014
Hastings Carew-Reid	John	High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Royal Courts of Justice	25/05/2014
Hurst	Ann Stephanie	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	27/11/2014
Hurst	Robert Alfred	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	27/11/2014
Ismail	Afham J and Bibi Nazrah	Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	11/04/2014
Ismail	Nazrah	Court of Appeal (Civil) Royal Courts of Justice	09/09/2015
Johnson	Grace Georgia	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	27/06/2015
Kabba	Mohammed	High Court Queens Bench Division, Birmingham District Registry	04/03/2015
Kassanga	Reuben	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	07/05/2015
Kelly	Roger Thomas	Liverpool County Court	25/10/2015
Khalil	Dr Magda	Royal Courts of Justice	25/06/2014
Khan	Raja Saddiq	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	07/08/2015
Krause	Jan	Royal Courts of Justice	10/11/2015
Kumar	Kamal	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	19/11/2015
Lima (Mr)	Luis	High Court of Justice, Chancery Division	15/07/2015
Linder	Eugene	Brighton	31/0/2014
Locker	Terence & Mrs Jean	Birmingham High Court Appeal Centre	16/11/2014
MacDonald	John	Leicester County Court	15/07/2015
Makar	Mira	Queen's Bench Divison, Commercial Court, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	04/12/2014
Malik	Kamran	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	29/07/2015
Malik	Kamran	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	29/07/2015
Malik	Kamran	Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice	21/05/2014
Marchington	Colin Joseph	Manchester District Registry	04/08/2014
Marcus	Laurence	Cambridge County Court	28/11/2014
Mashate	Dr. Jesse	High Court, Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	14/02/2014
Massie	Stephen Robert	Chester County Court	15/02/2014
Matthews	Derrick Arthur	Cambridge County Court	14/04/2015
Mudge	Doulgas Maxillian Lorenzo	Carlisle County Court	09/05/2015
Murray-Cowan	Peter Leonard	Cambridge County Court	06/06/2015
Naidu	Dr Venkat M S	Royal Courts of Justice	28/02/2015
Nisar	Ahmed	Administrative Court Office, Royal Courts of Justice	15/07/2015
Norman	Donna	Administrative Court Office; Royal Courts of Justice	15/11/2014
Norman	Donna	Royal Courts of Justice	08/02/2015
Nowak	Przemyslaw	Royal Courts of Justice	23/07/2015
Padruth	Luchoomansing Dharam	Royal Courts of Justice	31/01/2014
Phipps	Robert William	Oxford County Court	06/06/2015
Piesse	Michael	Tunbridge Wells County Court	20/11/2015
Pius	Tofigh	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	17/04/2015
Riley	Joanne	Queens Bench Division, Administrative Court in Wales, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre	21/05/2014
Ryder-Large	Conrad	RCJ Queens Bench Division Administrative Court	01/06/2014
Senior-Milne	Graham Nassau Gordon	Administrative Court Office, Leeds	26/02/2015
Sharma	Yogendra Babu	Oxford County Court	01/03/2014
Sheikh	Anal	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	20/12/2014
Shelly	Gary	High Court of Justice Chancery Divison	17/05/2014
Smith	Rodney	Newcastle-upon-Tyne County Court	20/09/2015
Stephenson	Janet	Family Division Royal Courts of Justice	23/01/2015
Sturgeon	Peter James	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice	25/05/2014
Sturgess	David	Swansea County Court	21/02/2014
Sweeney	William M	High Courts of Justice, Queens Bench Division	04/06/2015
Swinbourne	Miranda; Matthew	Blackpool County Court	01/06/2014 or until order is discharged
Their	Tracy Lee	High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division	10/05/2014
Townsend	Bernard	Oxford County Court	28/02/2015
Townsend	Sharon	Oxford County Court	28/02/2015
Voges	Michael Keith	Royal Courts of Justice	28/04/2015
Waghorn	David Anthony	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	13/05/2015
Walker	Christine Diane	Rhyl County Court	29/07/2015
Waugh	John Thomas	Newcastle upon Tyne District Registry	26/07/2015
Waugh	Michael John	Newcastle upon Tyne District Registry	26/07/2015
Webster	Stewart GF	Administrative Court Office, Leeds	15/05/2015
Wells	Ivor	Oldham	05/09/2014
West	Russell Spencer Woodward	Royal Courts of Justice	11/09/2015
Wicks	Christopher	Nottingham County Court	21/11/2015
Willis	Barbara Elenor Rosemary	Bristol County Court	01/02/2015
Willis	William Henry Ralph	Bristol County Court	01/02/2015
Wilson	Sandra Elaine	Birmingham County Court	19/03/2015
Winsor	Robert Ian	Chancery Division, Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice	22/10/2016
Wright	Wesley John	Gloucester and Cheltenham County Court	26/02/2015

Updated: Monday, 16 December 2013

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

Diy Law Shop Limited,

52 Rugby Road

Hinckley

Leicestershire

LE10 0QD

Tel: 01455 233058

skype: nigelbaggaley0612

www.diylawshop.co.uk

I do not believe for one moment that the order even existed in the first instance, I believe the court in Coventry or Nuneaton have re-raised a dormant order that they knew had not been served and notification had not been given. I understand that is a serious allegation, however after years of dealing with court offices around the country I am not surprised by their actions at all. I look forward to the day the court office staff in county courts are held accountable for their actions, i believe some of them are in the pockets of certain law firms, firms that seem to get priority treatment, Smith Partnership being one such firm, whilst everybody else has a 10 day waiting period for the court office in Leicester CC to even look at the papers put to the court, Smith Partnership are able to arrange hearings within 48 hours - of non emergency issues at all. It is disgusting and out of date behaviour, therefore I am not surprised in the least in the court office staff conspiring with the barrister to pull out an order as though it is an lawful order, served and notified, and then act as though it has been in place for almost 2 years after the same court staff know very well they have dealt with me on many occasions re other cases and also know i have acted as MKF as recently as 2 weeks prior in their same court. It is simply not believable that they were unaware for 18 months of this order and all of a sudden HHJ Bellamy comes along and the order appears out of thin air. I state this order had been illegally made after the the date it states it was made, in fact i believe this order was written up on the day HHJ Bellamy said it existed, or maybe just prior and probably through Mr O’Grady and whomever his contact is at Coventry CC, I say Coventry because that is the court HHJ Bellamy keeps on relating it to, however it is Nuneaton County Court the order seems to originate from.
I wish to add that when calling Coventry CC following the hearing with HHJ Bellamy Coventry CC denied in full for 2 days the first restraining order existed, I believed them then and I believe them now.
This is my amended statement.

Nigel Baggaley

HHJ Tyzack - the worst Judge in the UK - NOW RETIRED!!! OH YES HES GONE!!

Tuesday 14 January 2014

my open statement to the president Lord Justice Munby for the hearing 17th January 2014

Civil restraint orders

No comments:

Post a Comment